Nearly every company today claims to be “doing something” about climate change. But increasingly, investors, regulators, and clients want proof—not just promises. That’s why science-based targets (SBTs) have become the gold standard for credible climate action.
Developed by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), these targets align your greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction commitments with what climate science says is necessary to limit global warming to 1.5°C.
What Makes a Target “Science-Based”?
Unlike self-declared goals, science-based targets use standardized methodologies to ensure reductions are proportional to your company’s emissions and sector. This includes:
- Scope 1 & 2: Direct emissions and purchased energy
- Scope 3: Indirect value chain emissions (often the majority)
- Time-bound: Targets are typically set for 5–15 years
- Validated: Reviewed and approved by the SBTi
These targets demonstrate to stakeholders that your decarbonization strategy isn’t just real—it’s responsible.
Why SBTs Are More Than Marketing
Companies with SBTi-validated targets outperform their peers in ESG ratings and procurement access. For suppliers and mid-sized businesses, aligning with science-based targets can be a decisive advantage in securing contracts with larger, net-zero committed firms.
They also signal climate readiness to investors, making you a safer long-term bet in a carbon-constrained economy.
How ECG Helps You Get It Right
At ECG Global Solutions, we support companies through every phase of SBT adoption:
- Baseline emissions inventory across Scopes 1–3
- Sector-aligned target modeling (e.g. absolute contraction, SDA)
- Scenario analysis and reduction roadmap development
- Documentation and submission to SBTi for validation
- Internal training and implementation planning
Our approach isn’t just about setting a target. It’s about making sure you can achieve it—and prove it to the world.
The Takeaway
If you’re serious about climate leadership, science-based targets aren’t optional. They’re the new minimum. And they’re fast becoming the line between bold claims and credible climate action.
